Jump to content
  • Sign Up

GM Facing Class Action Lawsuit Over Lifters


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

A full mechanical delete, sure that's more than just programming.  GM could simply write a new ECM calibration that can be flashed at the dealer to disable AFM, just like someone can do with HP Tuners.  It would at least be something that could be offered as we all know they won't fork out of pocket for a full mechanical delete.  That would be reserved for those with a current down truck from AFM failure or if someone complained enough.  

 

An electronic disable does significantly reduce the odds of future failure (not 100% eliminate failure rate but close to it).

I'm not really sure.  I recall all of those folks being happy during the "chip shortage" where they were saying that the was no more AFM.  I had to clarify that this information wasn't true.  I am also not sure if electronically disabling the cylinder deactivation has any meaningful change in failure rate.  I am not sure if there is any solid evidence that shows AFM or DFM failure only when in deactivation mode.  I suppose failure would be possible at any time, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

🤔 IMHO, the problem with lifter topics is that they try to fit all failures into a single causal mode. That's like saying that all tree branches break due to overweight pigeons sitting on them and getting rid of pigeons will stop all branches from breaking. 

 

There are several TSB's out on this issue and many more without. Broken lifter lock pin spring. Low oil pressure. Low oil level. High oil level. Oil foaming. Wrong oil. Oil pump issue. Leaking VLOM. Faulty VLOM solenoid. Broken valve spring. Retainer or keeper failure. Failed pushrod. Bad heat-treat of cam, roller, lock pin or roller axle. Worn lifter bore. Rocker trunnion failure. Stud failure. Failed cam position sensor. ECU or ECU harness issue. 

 

How many of these will a disabler address? How many will a DOD delete address? How many will better maintenance address? How many will low bid contracts cause? How bad will half measure repairs aggravate the situation? How many bases can you cover? 😏

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

🤔 IMHO, the problem with lifter topics is that they try to fit all failures into a single causal mode. That's like saying that all tree branches break due to overweight pigeons sitting on them and getting rid of pigeons will stop all branches from breaking. 

 

There are several TSB's out on this issue and many more without. Broken lifter lock pin spring. Low oil pressure. Low oil level. High oil level. Oil foaming. Wrong oil. Oil pump issue. Leaking VLOM. Faulty VLOM solenoid. Broken valve spring. Retainer or keeper failure. Failed pushrod. Bad heat-treat of cam, roller, lock pin or roller axle. Worn lifter bore. Rocker trunnion failure. Stud failure. Failed cam position sensor. ECU or ECU harness issue. 

 

How many of these will a disabler address? How many will a DOD delete address? How many will better maintenance address? How many will low bid contracts cause? How bad will half measure repairs aggravate the situation? How many bases can you cover? 😏

 

 

When lifters are failing on brand new engines, maintenance has zero input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

I'm not really sure.  I recall all of those folks being happy during the "chip shortage" where they were saying that the was no more AFM.  I had to clarify that this information wasn't true.  I am also not sure if electronically disabling the cylinder deactivation has any meaningful change in failure rate.  I am not sure if there is any solid evidence that shows AFM or DFM failure only when in deactivation mode.  I suppose failure would be possible at any time, personally.

 

 

We've sold a good amount of 5.3 with DFM missing from the chip shortage.  None have come with lifter failure so far.  M 2019 LD I had disabled via HP Tuners from day one and went almost 50k mi with zero lifter failure before I traded for my 2.7 HO.  

Edited by newdude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

When lifters are failing on brand new engines, maintenance has zero input.

 

Wrong oil, low oil, high oil, oil foaming are all maintenance inputs Blain that can happen on the initial prep. Besides, picking one of more than a dozen causes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

🤔 IMHO, the problem with lifter topics is that they try to fit all failures into a single causal mode. That's like saying that all tree branches break due to overweight pigeons sitting on them and getting rid of pigeons will stop all branches from breaking. 

 

There are several TSB's out on this issue and many more without. Broken lifter lock pin spring. Low oil pressure. Low oil level. High oil level. Oil foaming. Wrong oil. Oil pump issue. Leaking VLOM. Faulty VLOM solenoid. Broken valve spring. Retainer or keeper failure. Failed pushrod. Bad heat-treat of cam, roller, lock pin or roller axle. Worn lifter bore. Rocker trunnion failure. Stud failure. Failed cam position sensor. ECU or ECU harness issue. 

 

How many of these will a disabler address? How many will a DOD delete address? How many will better maintenance address? How many will low bid contracts cause? How bad will half measure repairs aggravate the situation? How many bases can you cover? 😏

 

 

I had several small block Chevy engines in the 70s most were noisy some had cam wear problems. Some got diesel oil during oil changes because it was there. Every one got the snot kicked out of them. Non failed. I just got rid of recently a 92 modified Chevy engine powered truck. It was stroked, blown with 12 lbs of boost, MSD ignition. It used one qt of oil every 500 miles for the 12 years I had it. Where am I going with this? I don’t mind doing a little more preventive maintenance to reach a mileage goal. It seems some vehicles need extensive maintenance just to reach normal mileage goals. Those I’ll avoid.

Edited by KARNUT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    247.7k
    Total Topics
    2.6m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    336,614
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Grimaries
    Newest Member
    Grimaries
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 996 Guests (See full list)




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.