Jump to content

2.7 Turbo 4 Fan Club


Recommended Posts

This might not be related to 2.7, but i think a lot of Custom trims are in here.

 

How do I determine what fluid to use in my front and rear diffs? Also transfer case?

 

I know there are several different axles and a few different transfer cases now, the owners manual says "see dealer" but I am not about to take my truck there.

 

I am coming up on 50k miles and want to replace the diff fluid and transfer case fluid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fondupot said:

This might not be related to 2.7, but i think a lot of Custom trims are in here.

 

How do I determine what fluid to use in my front and rear diffs? Also transfer case?

 

I know there are several different axles and a few different transfer cases now, the owners manual says "see dealer" but I am not about to take my truck there.

 

I am coming up on 50k miles and want to replace the diff fluid and transfer case fluid.

Easy Peasy : https://www.amsoil.com/lookup/auto-and-light-truck/2022/chevrolet/silverado-1500-ltd/2-7l-4-cyl-engine-code-k-l3b-k-turbo/?volume=us-volume

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fondupot said:

 

Right but how do I determine if I have the rear 8.6 rg, vs 9.5 vs 9.76?

Doesn’t matter. Same SVG Amsoil used in all of them. You could look up the build list but your trail boss is equipped from factory same as rest of trail boss builds for driveline. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2023 at 9:33 AM, Mike Borowski said:

This looks like the first real good tuner for the 2.7L. I’ve talked to the customer service guys and I’m going to order it, I’ll keep this post updated. 
 

https://burgertuning.com/collections/chevrolet-gmc

 

the elephant in the room for me is the stock dyno on that 2022 refresh custom showing only 7 more ft/lbs torque than the hp at the wheels, 255 hp and 262 ft/lbs torque (rated 310/430 at crank), which would suggest even less torque than the gen 1 tune....when the torque should be 100+ ft/lbs more than the hp number...do we need to put some trucks on dyno's and start figuring out if class action required due to false advertising is required? like how did it get a 430 ft/lb rating to advertise with? 

Edited by 4banger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 4banger said:

 

the elephant in the room for me is the stock dyno on that 2022 refresh custom showing only 7 more ft/lbs torque than the hp at the wheels, 255 hp and 262 ft/lbs torque (rated 310/430 at crank), which would suggest even less torque than the gen 1 tune....when the torque should be 100+ ft/lbs more than the hp number...do we need to put some trucks on dyno's and start figuring out if class action required due to false advertising is required? like how did it get a 430 ft/lb rating to advertise with? 

It’s a first gen 2.7 - so essentially with Map 2 the first gen would make the factory numbers at the wheels. 
 

I’ll probably never dyno it but I’m anxious to see how it feels during regular driving. 

Edited by Mike Borowski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mike Borowski said:

It’s a first gen 2.7 - so essentially with Map 2 the first gen would make the factory numbers at the wheels. 
 

I’ll probably never dyno it but I’m anxious to see how it feels during regular driving. 

the image they show of a truck on the dyno is a 2022 refresh custom, the curve they provide for the 2023+ chev turbo is what I'm talking about, what am I missing? where's the refresh dyno result?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4banger said:

the image they show of a truck on the dyno is a 2022 refresh custom, the curve they provide for the 2023+ chev turbo is what I'm talking about, what am I missing? where's the refresh dyno result?


I’m confused.  The dyno sheet says 2021_silverado_baseline  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4banger said:

the image they show of a truck on the dyno is a 2022 refresh custom, the curve they provide for the 2023+ chev turbo is what I'm talking about, what am I missing? where's the refresh dyno result?

 

I’m confused.  The dyno sheet says 2021_silverado_baseline  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mike Borowski said:

I’m confused.  The dyno sheet says 2021_silverado_baseline  

Lol me too, I hope there’s satisfactory answers. I’ll see about contacting them next week for clarity. Nothing like showing a 430 ft/lb truck with the wrong dyno chart below it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 4banger said:

Lol me too, I hope there’s satisfactory answers. I’ll see about contacting them next week for clarity. Nothing like showing a 430 ft/lb truck with the wrong dyno chart below it.

I guess I didn’t think much of it lol. I have the 1st gen so I would be happy with those dyno numbers at the wheels haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mike Borowski said:

I guess I didn’t think much of it lol. I have the 1st gen so I would be happy with those dyno numbers at the wheels haha. 

Well ya, and then claim the same gains for the 2023+ versions? Like you’re going to add another 100 ft/lbs over the high output? Would that be realistic? Anyway, we should seek clarity. Totally agree with 1st Gen getting to those numbers. I’d do same. Now just need to clarify what the high output base dyno is and what the gains are for those, because according to their pics they have a high output there on the dyno.

Edited by 4banger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 4banger said:

Well ya, and then claim the same gains for the 2023+ versions? Like you’re going to add another 100 ft/lbs over the high output? Would that be realistic? Anyway, we should seek clarity. Totally agree with 1st Gen getting to those numbers. I’d do same. Now just need to clarify what the high output base dyno is and what the gains are for those, because according to their pics they have a high output there on the dyno.

I 100% agree with you. Why don’t you email them. They responded to me real quick and were really nice. If it’s a different email then at least it looks like more interest in the 2.7L which hopefully will equal more R&D on tunes etc. for it  

Edited by Mike Borowski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Mike Borowski said:

I 100% agree with you. Why don’t you email them. They responded to me real quick and were really nice. If it’s a different email then at least it looks like more interest in the 2.7L which hopefully will equal more R&D on tunes etc. for it  

email sent this morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    247.6k
    Total Topics
    2.6m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    336,428
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Goat House
    Newest Member
    Goat House
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 674 Guests (See full list)




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.