Official 2019 5.3L & 6.2L V8 Engine Specs Are Here

[Zane]

Zane Merva

Executive Editor, GM-Trucks.com

5/18/2018

 

As it turns out, the leaked figures for the 2019 5.3L and 6.2L V8 engines wasn't far off. That's the good news. The bad news is the SAE certified horsepower and torque will match 2018's numbers exactly. 

 

But that doesn't mean the 2018 and 2019 engines are the same. Instead of the 2018's Active Fuel Management, which allows the engine to switch between four and eight cylinders, the 2019 V8's have Dynamic Fuel Management. DFM can adjust the firing cylinders in up to 17 different ways. Theoretically, that should mean improved fuel economy at the same power output. Chevrolet hasn't released any fuel economy numbers yet, so that is just a theory. 

 

But if you really like the 2018 5.3L V8 and want to buy it again with the 2019 Silverado, fear not. You can option it with a six-speed transmission for WT, LT, and LT Trail Boss trims. 

 

--------------------

2019 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 5.3L WITH DYNAMIC FUEL MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS

Type:	5.3L V-8 VVT DI with Dynamic Fuel Management
Bore & Stroke (in / mm):	3.78 x 3.62 / 96 x 92
Block Material:	Cast aluminum
Cylinder Head Material:	Cast aluminum
Compression Ratio:	11.0:1
Firing Order:	1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3
Valvetrain:	Overhead valve, two valves per cylinder, variable valve timing
Fuel Delivery:	Direct high-pressure fuel injection with Dynamic Fuel Management
Ignition System:	High-energy coil-on-plug
Horsepower (hp / kW @ rpm):	355 / 265 @ 5600 rpm (SAE certified)
Torque                          (lb.-ft. / Nm @ rpm):	383 / 519 @ 4100 rpm (SAE certified)
Manufacturing Location	Tonawanda Engine Plant, Buffalo, N.Y.

 

2019 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 6.2L WITH DYNAMIC FUEL MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS

Type:	6.2L V-8 VVT DI with Dynamic Fuel Management
Bore & Stroke (in / mm):	4.06 x 3.62 / 103.25 x 92
Block Material:	Cast aluminum
Cylinder Head Material:	Cast aluminum
Compression Ratio:	11.5:1
Firing Order:	1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3
Valvetrain:	Overhead valve, two valves per cylinder, variable valve timing
Fuel Delivery:	Direct high-pressure fuel injection with Dynamic Fuel Management
Ignition System:	High-energy coil-on-plug
Horsepower (hp / kW @ rpm):	420 / 313 @ 5600 rpm (SAE certified)
Torque                          (lb.-ft. / Nm @ rpm):	460 / 621 @ 4100 rpm (SAE certified)
Manufacturing Location	Tonawanda, N.Y.

[BigBadSierra]

Well I better say WOW when I see the fuel millage.

[magnum74]

With the two entry levels, 3.0 Duramax and two V8's #6 has to be a premium offering. I also don't think the current output 6.2/10-speed on a platform that weighs 400-500lbs less will be anything of a disappointment but it obviously effects the market that looks at numbers. If GM wants to capitalize on this group they'll need to make one more splash even if it's limited to the very high end (Denali, AT4 maybe High Country) similar to what Ford is doing with the Raptor 3.5.

[Payton34]

How about a final engine option of the LT4 supercharged 650hp in the higher trim trucks (Denali & AT4).  Also build a Silverado SS and GMC sport truck with this motor.  No truck brand is offering a true performance sport truck any longer.  I would never own a 2wd lowered truck but I am sure there would be a market for it.

[magnum74]

4 minutes ago, Payton34 said:

How about a final engine option of the LT4 supercharged 650hp in the higher trim trucks (Denali & AT4).  Also build a Silverado SS and GMC sport truck with this motor.  No truck brand is offering a true performance sport truck any longer.  I would never own a 2wd lowered truck but I am sure there would be a market for it.

Yup, and it's not like GM isn't experienced with supercharging the 6.2's already. Almost seems natural to offer a version in the full size truck and SUV models. 

[Vicarod]

Sadly, it looks as if the 6th engine option will be the 2018 5.3 V8 with AFM and 6spd transmission.

 

 

[newdude]

Anyone else pick out the visual differences?  LT5 style valve cover covers, 2 belts instead of 3 belts, no more vacuum pump, and the water pump is now centered instead of offset.  Where the water pump was appears to be an idler pulley?  I'm guessing they may have gone to an electric vacuum pump like Corvette has. 

Edited May 18, 2018 by newdude

[Chainesaw]

5 hours ago, Payton34 said:

How about a final engine option of the LT4 supercharged 650hp in the higher trim trucks (Denali & AT4).  Also build a Silverado SS and GMC sport truck with this motor.  No truck brand is offering a true performance sport truck any longer.  I would never own a 2wd lowered truck but I am sure there would be a market for it.

I wish they would - that's the truck I WANT - but no one is offering anything like it.. I was really hoping this year would be the year.... guess I'm keeping my '15 6.2L  - Don't _love_ the new look and with the same HP rating, there really is no reason to trade up. 

[gone_fishing]

On 5/18/2018 at 12:16 PM, newdude said:

Anyone else pick out the visual differences?  LT5 style valve cover covers, 2 belts instead of 3 belts, no more vacuum pump, and the water pump is now centered instead of offset.  Where the water pump was appears to be an idler pulley?  I'm guessing they may have gone to an electric vacuum pump like Corvette has. 

Don't see a belt tensioner either. Also looks like the moved the dipstick to the passenger side and made oil fill tube taller. Oil pan also looks a little different. Appears to be a single piece of aluminum vs two piece aluminum with steel lower pan on the L83. Something different with the driver side valve cover breather hose too. Has a hose going back somewhere behind the intake manifold (out of view).

[Nargg]

The numbers game always cracks me up.  Especially with the public at large, who really doesn't understand physics that much.  GM is known for being conservative in their ratings, for very good reasons.  And, it shows with their trucks being the longest lasting on the road.  Not to mention the most civilized in driving dynamics.  Also, a lot of people seem to forget that the aftermarket business is not slowing down.  If you really are that full of testosterone, and need more there is a way to get there, no matter what make or model of truck you own.

 

Now, down to real discussion on what I feel we should expect.  I'm still very impressed with the MPG from my 2015 5.3 L Chevy.  My average from the truck I owned before, a 2011, is 3 MPG higher.  That's amazing.  If the new fuel management systems GM is putting in place gain another one or two, that's a gold mine in gas savings for me.  I'm looking forward to it.

The MPG wars do, I feel, have one negative.  It seems to me that towing should be going up more for all major truck makers.  It's moving up for sure, but doesn't quite seem to keep pace with the HP and Torque increases.  That's likely due to the push for MPG, which is not bad.  But just interesting to me to watch the progression of modern trucks.  

[canucktravellers]

I would hope that the Allison Tranny is an option in these vehicles as we have a 1500 LTZ 2017 6.2Liter E/W the 8 speed Tranny, this transmission is horrible, it agressibly shifts with a big thud and the dealer(s) can find "no problem"  if the Duramax would have been available we would gladly have paid the premium. We had previously the 2500HD with the  6.6 Duramax/Allison before and it was a dream, hated to trade it but was going lighter in an RV so didnt need all that torque.

[Colossus]

No the allison won't be an option.  If it were, you'd hear all about it.  It's a darn shame.  The Allison 1000 has proven itself over the years as being bulletproof as long as you do the recommended maintenance and don't run performance tunes on them. 

[wrath]

I have a 2015 L86/6.2L 8L90e NHT truck.

 

Before that I had a 2009 L76/6.0L 6L80e Z60 truck.  I liked that truck a lot.  Took a couple flashes before they got the 6L80e right.  Waited and waited for them to do the L86/8L90e.

 

The 8L90e is OK.  Not great.  I have had the converter and radiator replaced just like a lot of other people.  TCC still slips once in a while.  Have had the ECM and BCM flashed many times and it always has the latest tune from GM.

 

It has slowly lost gas mileage.  It's down to averaging in the 17s on the same commute I used to get 21-22.  Every new operating system the gas mileage goes down.  I suspect a lot of it is an attempt to fix various drive-ability issues with the 8L90e (there are a lot of them).

 

It now has a loud bang when you roll from coast to accelerate quickly... it's way more than drivetrain slop.  The transmission never really seems to know what to do.  The latest tune partially fixed the garage park/garage flare issue (not shifting, waiting a while for the pump to build pressure) and the TCC slip issue.

 

I have hptuners so I watch it all the time.  I would say the first 15,000 miles (before the TCC ate itself and started slipping 50+rpm when locked) the truck was great.  Good gas mileage, excellent driving characteristics, etc.

 

I use both trucks about the same.  Same tires (Duratrac), same configuration (extended cab, short box, 4wd), same accessories (hellwig rear sway bar, firestone bags).  Tow the same boring stuff with it.

 

Since the 6.2L didn't get any refresh on its specifications and I don't trust the 10L90e after the 8L90e problems I've had... I'll be waiting to replace my truck.  Plus the lack of pause on the radio/XM on the 2016+ trucks is stupid.

Edited May 21, 2018 by wrath

[shift_grind]

23 hours ago, wrath said:

I have a 2015 L86/6.2L 8L90e NHT truck.

 

Before that I had a 2009 L76/6.0L 6L80e Z60 truck.  I liked that truck a lot.  Took a couple flashes before they got the 6L80e right.  Waited and waited for them to do the L86/8L90e.

 

The 8L90e is OK.  Not great.  I have had the converter and radiator replaced just like a lot of other people.  TCC still slips once in a while.  Have had the ECM and BCM flashed many times and it always has the latest tune from GM.

 

It has slowly lost gas mileage.  It's down to averaging in the 17s on the same commute I used to get 21-22.  Every new operating system the gas mileage goes down.  I suspect a lot of it is an attempt to fix various drive-ability issues with the 8L90e (there are a lot of them).

 

It now has a loud bang when you roll from coast to accelerate quickly... it's way more than drivetrain slop.  The transmission never really seems to know what to do.  The latest tune partially fixed the garage park/garage flare issue (not shifting, waiting a while for the pump to build pressure) and the TCC slip issue.

 

I have hptuners so I watch it all the time.  I would say the first 15,000 miles (before the TCC ate itself and started slipping 50+rpm when locked) the truck was great.  Good gas mileage, excellent driving characteristics, etc.

 

I use both trucks about the same.  Same tires (Duratrac), same configuration (extended cab, short box, 4wd), same accessories (hellwig rear sway bar, firestone bags).  Tow the same boring stuff with it.

 

Since the 6.2L didn't get any refresh on its specifications and I don't trust the 10L90e after the 8L90e problems I've had... I'll be waiting to replace my truck.  Plus the lack of pause on the radio/XM on the 2016+ trucks is stupid.

Sorry about your luck.  It will be interesting to see what 2019 owners say about the 8 and 10 speed.  Perhaps they identified the issues with the 8 speed and the 8 speed will be great in the 19's.

[kilowhiskey]

15 hours ago, shift_grind said:

Sorry about your luck.  It will be interesting to see what 2019 owners say about the 8 and 10 speed.  Perhaps they identified the issues with the 8 speed and the 8 speed will be great in the 19's.

I think the 10 spd will be amazing. They co developed it with ford.